| bord | kontrakt | izv. | ataka | tih. | rezultat | ∑ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pajak - Razik (5) | 3 NT | E |  4 |
= | 400 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2 | Pajak - Razik (5) | 3 NT | S | 4 |
-2 | 200 | 3 | 3 | |
| 3 | Pajak - Razik (5) | 3 NT | E |  A |
+1 | 630 | 7 | 10 | |
| 7 | Mikiĉ - Bjedov (15) | 4  |
W | K |
= | 620 | 6 | 16 | |
| 8 | Mikiĉ - Bjedov (15) | 4 |
S | 8 |
-1 | 50 | 3 | 19 | |
| 9 | Mikiĉ - Bjedov (15) | 2 |
N |  6 |
+1 | 140 | 0 | 19 | |
| 13 | Burakowski - Ciechomski (1) | 1 NT | E | 3 |
+1 | 120 | -3 | 16 | |
| 14 | Burakowski - Ciechomski (1) | 4 |
W | 3 |
-1 | 50 | 0 | 16 | |
| 15 | Burakowski - Ciechomski (1) | 2 |
N | 3 |
+2 | 170 | 0 | 16 | |
| 19 | Raduly - Bikki (18) | 6 NT | N | J |
-1 | 50 | 11 | 27 | |
| 20 | Raduly - Bikki (18) | 4 |
W | J |
= | 620 | 7 | 34 | |
| 21 | Raduly - Bikki (18) | 1 |
N | 10 |
+1 | 90 | -1 | 33 | |
| 25 | redl - Richter (11) | 3 NT | E | Q |
+4 | 720 | 1 | 34 | |
| 26 | redl - Richter (11) | 2 NT | E | 2 |
= | 120 | 0 | 34 | |
| 27 | redl - Richter (11) | 4 |
E | A |
-2 | 100 | -5 | 29 | |
| 4 | M.Muller - Zudenigo (17) | 1 NT | E | 4 |
-1 | 100 | 1 | 30 | |
| 5 | M.Muller - Zudenigo (17) | 4 x |
S | K |
-1 | 200 | 3 | 33 | |
| 6 | M.Muller - Zudenigo (17) | 4 |
N | 5 |
-1 | 50 | 10 | 43 | |
| 10 | Atalski - Raczkiewicz (6) | 3 NT | S | 6 |
+4 | 720 | -1 | 42 | |
| 11 | Atalski - Raczkiewicz (6) | 5 |
W | A |
= | 450 | 0 | 42 | |
| 12 | Atalski - Raczkiewicz (6) | 1 NT | W | 9 |
= | 90 | 0 | 42 | |
| 16 | Rieger - Rohrbock (10) | 3 |
W | J |
+2 | 200 | 2 | 44 | |
| 17 | Rieger - Rohrbock (10) | 1 NT | E | Q |
= | 90 | 0 | 44 | |
| 18 | Rieger - Rohrbock (10) | 4 |
N | 4 |
-3 | 300 | 8 | 52 | |
| 22 | Lasczak - Rutkowski (3) | 2 xx |
E | A |
-2 | 1000 | -13 | 39 | |
| 23 | Lasczak - Rutkowski (3) | 4 xx |
N | 3 |
= | 920 | -11 | 28 | |
| 24 | Lasczak - Rutkowski (3) | 3 |
N | 2 |
-1 | 50 | 4 | 32 | |
| 32 | |||||||||