| bord | kontrakt | izv. | ataka | tih. | rezultat | ∑ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | Mikić - Bjedov (15) | 4  |
E |  J |
-2 | 200 | -2 | -2 | |
| 5 | Mikić - Bjedov (15) | 3  |
N | 9 |
+2 | 150 | -6 | -8 | |
| 6 | Mikić - Bjedov (15) | 5 |
N |  A |
+2 | 510 | -3 | -11 | |
| 10 | Burakowski - Ciechomski (1) | 4 |
N | 3 |
-1 | 100 | 13 | 2 | |
| 11 | Burakowski - Ciechomski (1) | 4 x |
N | A |
-1 | 100 | -8 | -6 | |
| 12 | Burakowski - Ciechomski (1) | 1 NT | W | 6 |
= | 90 | 0 | -6 | |
| 16 | Raduly - Bikki (18) | 2 |
N | 5 |
+2 | 170 | -8 | -14 | |
| 17 | Raduly - Bikki (18) | 1 NT | E | 10 |
= | 90 | 0 | -14 | |
| 18 | Raduly - Bikki (18) | 4 |
N | 3 |
-1 | 100 | 4 | -10 | |
| 22 | redl - Richter (11) | 2 |
E | A |
-1 | 100 | 1 | -9 | |
| 23 | redl - Richter (11) | 3 NT | N | 3 |
-2 | 200 | 12 | 3 | |
| 24 | redl - Richter (11) | 2 |
N | J |
= | 90 | 0 | 3 | |
| 1 | M.Muller - Zudenigo (17) | 3 NT | W | 8 |
= | 400 | 0 | 3 | |
| 2 | M.Muller - Zudenigo (17) | 5 |
S | 8 |
-1 | 100 | 1 | 4 | |
| 3 | M.Muller - Zudenigo (17) | 3 NT | E | 8 |
+1 | 630 | 7 | 11 | |
| 7 | Atalski - Raczkiewicz (6) | 4 |
E | 9 |
-1 | 100 | -10 | 1 | |
| 8 | Atalski - Raczkiewicz (6) | 3 |
S | 8 |
= | 140 | -2 | -1 | |
| 9 | Atalski - Raczkiewicz (6) | 2 |
N | 6 |
+1 | 140 | 0 | -1 | |
| 13 | Rieger - Rohrbock (10) | 1 NT | E | 9 |
= | 90 | -4 | -5 | |
| 14 | Rieger - Rohrbock (10) | 4 |
E | 10 |
-2 | 100 | -1 | -6 | |
| 15 | Rieger - Rohrbock (10) | 2 |
N | J |
= | 110 | 2 | -4 | |
| 19 | Lasczak - Rutkowski (3) | 4 NT | N | 3 |
+1 | 460 | 1 | -3 | |
| 20 | Lasczak - Rutkowski (3) | 3 |
E | A |
-3 | 300 | -12 | -15 | |
| 21 | Lasczak - Rutkowski (3) | 3 |
E | A |
-1 | 50 | 1 | -14 | |
| 25 | Pajak - Razik (5) | 3 NT | W | Q |
+2 | 660 | -1 | -15 | |
| 26 | Pajak - Razik (5) | 2 NT | W | 5 |
-1 | 100 | -6 | -21 | |
| 27 | Pajak - Razik (5) | 3 |
S | A |
-1 | 50 | -1 | -22 | |
| -22 | |||||||||