| bord | kontrakt | izv. | ataka | štih. | rezultat | ∑ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | Burakowski - Ciechomski (1) | 2  |
E |  3 |
+2 | 170 | -6 | -6 | |
| 8 | Burakowski - Ciechomski (1) | 4 |
S |  8 |
-1 | 50 | 3 | -3 | |
| 9 | Burakowski - Ciechomski (1) | 2 |
N | 3 |
+1 | 140 | 0 | -3 | |
| 13 | Raduly - Bikki (18) | 3 NT | E | 9 |
= | 600 | 9 | 6 | |
| 14 | Raduly - Bikki (18) | 3 NT | E | 7 |
= | 400 | 10 | 16 | |
| 15 | Raduly - Bikki (18) | 3 |
N | 8 |
+2 | 200 | -1 | 15 | |
| 19 | Šredl - Richter (11) | 6 NT | N | J |
= | 990 | -10 | 5 | |
| 20 | Šredl - Richter (11) | 4 |
E |  A |
= | 620 | 7 | 12 | |
| 21 | Šredl - Richter (11) | 2 |
W | A |
= | 110 | 5 | 17 | |
| 25 | M.Muller - Zudenigo (17) | 3 NT | E | 5 |
+2 | 660 | -1 | 16 | |
| 26 | M.Muller - Zudenigo (17) | 3 NT | W | 3 |
+1 | 630 | 11 | 27 | |
| 27 | M.Muller - Zudenigo (17) | 2 |
E | 7 |
+1 | 140 | 2 | 29 | |
| 4 | Atalski - Raczkiewicz (6) | 4 |
E | J |
-2 | 200 | -2 | 27 | |
| 5 | Atalski - Raczkiewicz (6) | 3 |
E | 2 |
-1 | 50 | -4 | 23 | |
| 6 | Atalski - Raczkiewicz (6) | 5 x |
S | A |
= | 650 | -6 | 17 | |
| 10 | Rieger - Rohrbock (10) | 3 NT | S | 3 |
+4 | 720 | -1 | 16 | |
| 11 | Rieger - Rohrbock (10) | 4 |
W | A |
+2 | 480 | 1 | 17 | |
| 12 | Rieger - Rohrbock (10) | 1 NT | W | 9 |
-2 | 100 | -5 | 12 | |
| 16 | Lasczak - Rutkowski (3) | 2 |
N | 9 |
= | 110 | -6 | 6 | |
| 17 | Lasczak - Rutkowski (3) | 2 |
E | Q |
+1 | 110 | 0 | 6 | |
| 18 | Lasczak - Rutkowski (3) | 4 |
N | 5 |
-1 | 100 | 4 | 10 | |
| 22 | Pajak - Razik (5) | 1 NT | S | 6 |
+1 | 120 | 0 | 10 | |
| 23 | Pajak - Razik (5) | 4 x |
E | K |
-4 | 1100 | -12 | -2 | |
| 24 | Pajak - Razik (5) | 1 x |
W | A |
= | 160 | 6 | 4 | |
| 1 | Mikić - Bjedov (15) | 3 NT | E | 9 |
= | 400 | 0 | 4 | |
| 2 | Mikić - Bjedov (15) | 5 |
N | 8 |
-1 | 100 | 1 | 5 | |
| 3 | Mikić - Bjedov (15) | 3 NT | E | 3 |
= | 600 | 7 | 12 | |
| 12 | |||||||||