| bord | kontrakt | izv. | ataka | tih. | rezultat | ∑ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | Raduly - Bikki (18) | 3 NT | N |  J |
+3 | 690 | 0 | 0 | |
| 11 | Raduly - Bikki (18) | 4 |
W |  A |
+1 | 450 | 0 | 0 | |
| 12 | Raduly - Bikki (18) | 1 NT | W | 8 |
+2 | 150 | 2 | 2 | |
| 16 | redl - Richter (11) | 4 |
E | 6 |
= | 620 | 10 | 12 | |
| 17 | redl - Richter (11) | 3  |
E | A |
= | 110 | 0 | 12 | |
| 18 | redl - Richter (11) | 2 |
N |  8 |
+1 | 140 | -3 | 9 | |
| 22 | M.Muller - Zudenigo (17) | 1 NT | S | 6 |
+1 | 120 | 0 | 9 | |
| 23 | M.Muller - Zudenigo (17) | 3 |
W | A |
-4 | 400 | 0 | 9 | |
| 24 | M.Muller - Zudenigo (17) | 2 NT | N | 5 |
+1 | 150 | -2 | 7 | |
| 1 | Atalski - Raczkiewicz (6) | 3 NT | W | 10 |
= | 400 | 0 | 7 | |
| 2 | Atalski - Raczkiewicz (6) | 3 NT | S | 8 |
= | 600 | -12 | -5 | |
| 3 | Atalski - Raczkiewicz (6) | 1 NT | E | 6 |
+2 | 150 | -5 | -10 | |
| 7 | Rieger - Rohrbock (10) | 4 |
W | Q |
= | 620 | 6 | -4 | |
| 8 | Rieger - Rohrbock (10) | 2 |
S | 8 |
+1 | 140 | -2 | -6 | |
| 9 | Rieger - Rohrbock (10) | 2 |
N | 7 |
+1 | 140 | 0 | -6 | |
| 13 | Lasczak - Rutkowski (3) | 3 NT | E | 7 |
= | 600 | 9 | 3 | |
| 14 | Lasczak - Rutkowski (3) | 4 |
E | 10 |
-1 | 50 | 0 | 3 | |
| 15 | Lasczak - Rutkowski (3) | 3 NT | N | 6 |
-3 | 300 | 10 | 13 | |
| 19 | Pajak - Razik (5) | 6 NT | S | J |
= | 990 | -10 | 3 | |
| 20 | Pajak - Razik (5) | 4 |
W | J |
-1 | 100 | -10 | -7 | |
| 21 | Pajak - Razik (5) | 1 NT | N | 5 |
= | 90 | -1 | -8 | |
| 25 | Mikiĉ - Bjedov (15) | 3 NT | E | Q |
+4 | 720 | 1 | -7 | |
| 26 | Mikiĉ - Bjedov (15) | 1 NT | E | 7 |
+1 | 120 | 0 | -7 | |
| 27 | Mikiĉ - Bjedov (15) | 2 |
E | 3 |
= | 110 | 1 | -6 | |
| 4 | Burakowski - Ciechomski (1) | 4 |
E | J |
-2 | 200 | -2 | -8 | |
| 5 | Burakowski - Ciechomski (1) | 3 |
S | K |
= | 110 | -5 | -13 | |
| 6 | Burakowski - Ciechomski (1) | 5 x |
N | A |
+2 | 850 | -10 | -23 | |
| -23 | |||||||||