| bord | kontrakt | izv. | ataka | tih. | rezultat | ∑ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 | redl - Richter (11) | 3 NT | E |  10 |
-1 | 100 | -8 | -8 | |
| 14 | redl - Richter (11) | 4  |
W |  10 |
-1 | 50 | 0 | -8 | |
| 15 | redl - Richter (11) | 2 |
N | 5 |
+3 | 200 | -1 | -9 | |
| 19 | M.Muller - Zudenigo (17) | 3 NT | N |  8 |
+3 | 490 | 0 | -9 | |
| 20 | M.Muller - Zudenigo (17) | 4 |
W | 6 |
-1 | 100 | -10 | -19 | |
| 21 | M.Muller - Zudenigo (17) | 4 |
W | A |
-2 | 100 | -1 | -20 | |
| 25 | Atalski - Raczkiewicz (6) | 5 |
E | 2 |
+2 | 640 | -1 | -21 | |
| 26 | Atalski - Raczkiewicz (6) | 3 NT | W | 7 |
= | 600 | 10 | -11 | |
| 27 | Atalski - Raczkiewicz (6) | 1 NT | W | 4 |
+1 | 120 | 1 | -10 | |
| 4 | Rieger - Rohrbock (10) | 2 |
E | J |
= | 110 | 6 | -4 | |
| 5 | Rieger - Rohrbock (10) | 3 NT | S | 9 |
-4 | 400 | 8 | 4 | |
| 6 | Rieger - Rohrbock (10) | 4 |
N | 5 |
-1 | 50 | 10 | 14 | |
| 10 | Lasczak - Rutkowski (3) | 3 NT | N | K |
+2 | 660 | 1 | 15 | |
| 11 | Lasczak - Rutkowski (3) | 5 |
E | A |
= | 450 | 0 | 15 | |
| 12 | Lasczak - Rutkowski (3) | 2 NT | N | K |
-1 | 100 | 0 | 15 | |
| 16 | Pajak - Razik (5) | 3 |
E | 7 |
+1 | 170 | 1 | 16 | |
| 17 | Pajak - Razik (5) | 1 NT | E | Q |
= | 90 | 0 | 16 | |
| 18 | Pajak - Razik (5) | 4 |
N | 5 |
= | 620 | -11 | 5 | |
| 22 | Mikiĉ - Bjedov (15) | 3 |
N | 6 |
= | 140 | -1 | 4 | |
| 23 | Mikiĉ - Bjedov (15) | 5 x |
N | 6 |
-2 | 500 | 14 | 18 | |
| 24 | Mikiĉ - Bjedov (15) | 2 NT | N | 6 |
-2 | 100 | 5 | 23 | |
| 1 | Burakowski - Ciechomski (1) | 3 NT | W | 10 |
= | 400 | 0 | 23 | |
| 2 | Burakowski - Ciechomski (1) | 3 NT | S | 8 |
+1 | 630 | -12 | 11 | |
| 3 | Burakowski - Ciechomski (1) | 1 |
S | J |
+1 | 110 | -10 | 1 | |
| 7 | Raduly - Bikki (18) | 4 |
W | K |
= | 620 | 6 | 7 | |
| 8 | Raduly - Bikki (18) | 2 |
S | 8 |
+1 | 140 | -2 | 5 | |
| 9 | Raduly - Bikki (18) | 2 |
N | K |
+1 | 140 | 0 | 5 | |
| 5 | |||||||||