| bord | kontrakt | izv. | ataka | tih. | rezultat | ∑ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19 | Atalski - Raczkiewicz (6) | 3 NT | N |  J |
+2 | 460 | 1 | 1 | |
| 20 | Atalski - Raczkiewicz (6) | 4 |
W |  J |
= | 620 | 7 | 8 | |
| 21 | Atalski - Raczkiewicz (6) | 1 |
W |  Q |
+1 | 110 | 5 | 13 | |
| 25 | Rieger - Rohrbock (10) | 3 NT | W | Q |
+1 | 630 | -2 | 11 | |
| 26 | Rieger - Rohrbock (10) | 3 |
N |  A |
+1 | 170 | -7 | 4 | |
| 27 | Rieger - Rohrbock (10) | PASS | N | 0 | -2 | 2 | |||
| 4 | Lasczak - Rutkowski (3) | 2 |
E | J |
= | 110 | 6 | 8 | |
| 5 | Lasczak - Rutkowski (3) | 4 |
N | A |
-1 | 100 | 1 | 9 | |
| 6 | Lasczak - Rutkowski (3) | 6 |
N | A |
+1 | 1010 | -12 | -3 | |
| 10 | Pajak - Razik (5) | 5 |
S | A |
+1 | 620 | 2 | -1 | |
| 11 | Pajak - Razik (5) | 5 |
W | A |
= | 450 | 0 | -1 | |
| 12 | Pajak - Razik (5) | 1 NT | W | 6 |
+2 | 150 | 2 | 1 | |
| 16 | Mikić - Bjedov (15) | 3 |
W | J |
+1 | 170 | 1 | 2 | |
| 17 | Mikić - Bjedov (15) | 3 |
W | Q |
= | 110 | 0 | 2 | |
| 18 | Mikić - Bjedov (15) | 5 |
N | 8 |
-2 | 200 | 6 | 8 | |
| 22 | Burakowski - Ciechomski (1) | 1 NT | S | 7 |
+1 | 120 | 0 | 8 | |
| 23 | Burakowski - Ciechomski (1) | 3 NT | S | 6 |
= | 600 | -5 | 3 | |
| 24 | Burakowski - Ciechomski (1) | 1 x |
W | A |
-2 | 300 | -6 | -3 | |
| 1 | Raduly - Bikki (18) | 3 NT | W | 6 |
= | 400 | 0 | -3 | |
| 2 | Raduly - Bikki (18) | 3 NT | S | 8 |
-2 | 200 | 3 | 0 | |
| 3 | Raduly - Bikki (18) | 2 |
W | J |
+1 | 140 | -5 | -5 | |
| 7 | redl - Richter (11) | 1 |
N | 5 |
= | 80 | -10 | -15 | |
| 8 | redl - Richter (11) | 4 NT | N | 5 |
-1 | 50 | 3 | -12 | |
| 9 | redl - Richter (11) | 2 |
N | 9 |
+1 | 140 | 0 | -12 | |
| 13 | M.Muller - Zudenigo (17) | 3 NT | E | 10 |
= | 600 | 9 | -3 | |
| 14 | M.Muller - Zudenigo (17) | 3 NT | E | 7 |
= | 400 | 10 | 7 | |
| 15 | M.Muller - Zudenigo (17) | 5 x |
E | 2 |
-2 | 300 | -3 | 4 | |
| 4 | |||||||||