| bord | kontrakt | izv. | ataka | štih. | rezultat | ∑ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 | Rieger - Rohrbock (10) | 1 NT | S |  8 |
= | 90 | 1 | 1 | |
| 23 | Rieger - Rohrbock (10) | 4  x |
N | Q |
= | 710 | -7 | -6 | |
| 24 | Rieger - Rohrbock (10) | 2 |
N |  6 |
+1 | 110 | -1 | -7 | |
| 1 | Lasczak - Rutkowski (3) | 3 NT | E | 8 |
= | 400 | 0 | -7 | |
| 2 | Lasczak - Rutkowski (3) | 3 |
E | A |
-2 | 100 | -5 | -12 | |
| 3 | Lasczak - Rutkowski (3) | 2 NT | E | 10 |
+1 | 150 | -5 | -17 | |
| 7 | Pajak - Razik (5) | 4 |
W | K |
+1 | 650 | 6 | -11 | |
| 8 | Pajak - Razik (5) | 2 |
S |  8 |
+2 | 170 | -3 | -14 | |
| 9 | Pajak - Razik (5) | 2 |
N | 8 |
+1 | 140 | 0 | -14 | |
| 13 | Mikić - Bjedov (15) | 1 NT | E | 9 |
= | 90 | -4 | -18 | |
| 14 | Mikić - Bjedov (15) | 3 NT | E | 10 |
-3 | 150 | -3 | -21 | |
| 15 | Mikić - Bjedov (15) | 3 |
N | 6 |
+1 | 170 | 0 | -21 | |
| 19 | Burakowski - Ciechomski (1) | 4 NT | S | 2 |
+2 | 490 | 0 | -21 | |
| 20 | Burakowski - Ciechomski (1) | 4 |
E | A |
-1 | 100 | -10 | -31 | |
| 21 | Burakowski - Ciechomski (1) | 3 |
W | A |
-1 | 50 | 1 | -30 | |
| 25 | Raduly - Bikki (18) | 6 NT | E | A |
= | 1440 | 13 | -17 | |
| 26 | Raduly - Bikki (18) | 2 |
S | 6 |
-1 | 100 | -1 | -18 | |
| 27 | Raduly - Bikki (18) | 2 |
W | 2 |
-1 | 50 | -4 | -22 | |
| 4 | Šredl - Richter (11) | 4 |
E | J |
-1 | 100 | 1 | -21 | |
| 5 | Šredl - Richter (11) | 5 |
S | A |
-2 | 200 | 3 | -18 | |
| 6 | Šredl - Richter (11) | 4 |
N | 4 |
+3 | 510 | -3 | -21 | |
| 10 | M.Muller - Zudenigo (17) | 5 |
S | 9 |
+1 | 620 | 2 | -19 | |
| 11 | M.Muller - Zudenigo (17) | 5 |
W | A |
= | 450 | 0 | -19 | |
| 12 | M.Muller - Zudenigo (17) | 2 |
N | 4 |
-3 | 300 | 5 | -14 | |
| 16 | Atalski - Raczkiewicz (6) | 3 |
N | 6 |
-1 | 50 | -3 | -17 | |
| 17 | Atalski - Raczkiewicz (6) | 2 |
E | Q |
+1 | 110 | 0 | -17 | |
| 18 | Atalski - Raczkiewicz (6) | 4 |
N | K |
-1 | 100 | 4 | -13 | |
| -13 | |||||||||