| bord | kontrakt | izv. | ataka | tih. | rezultat | ∑ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | Lasczak - Rutkowski (3) | 3 NT | E |  Q |
+2 | 660 | -1 | -1 | |
| 26 | Lasczak - Rutkowski (3) | 2 NT | E |  K |
= | 120 | 0 | -1 | |
| 27 | Lasczak - Rutkowski (3) | 1 NT | N |  3 |
-2 | 100 | 1 | 0 | |
| 4 | Pajak - Razik (5) | 4 |
E |  4 |
-1 | 100 | 1 | 1 | |
| 5 | Pajak - Razik (5) | 2 |
N | 10 |
-2 | 200 | 3 | 4 | |
| 6 | Pajak - Razik (5) | 5 |
N | A |
-1 | 50 | 10 | 14 | |
| 10 | Mikić - Bjedov (15) | 3 NT | S | 3 |
+4 | 720 | -1 | 13 | |
| 11 | Mikić - Bjedov (15) | 4 |
W | 2 |
+3 | 510 | 2 | 15 | |
| 12 | Mikić - Bjedov (15) | 1 NT | W | 8 |
= | 90 | 0 | 15 | |
| 16 | Burakowski - Ciechomski (1) | 4 |
E | 3 |
= | 620 | 10 | 25 | |
| 17 | Burakowski - Ciechomski (1) | 1 NT | E | 3 |
= | 90 | 0 | 25 | |
| 18 | Burakowski - Ciechomski (1) | 5 x |
E | 3 |
-2 | 300 | -7 | 18 | |
| 22 | Raduly - Bikki (18) | 1 NT | S | 10 |
= | 90 | 1 | 19 | |
| 23 | Raduly - Bikki (18) | 3 |
N | Q |
+1 | 130 | 7 | 26 | |
| 24 | Raduly - Bikki (18) | 2 |
N | 7 |
= | 90 | 0 | 26 | |
| 1 | redl - Richter (11) | 3 NT | E | 5 |
+1 | 430 | 1 | 27 | |
| 2 | redl - Richter (11) | 3 NT | N | 8 |
-2 | 200 | 3 | 30 | |
| 3 | redl - Richter (11) | 3 NT | E | 9 |
+1 | 630 | 7 | 37 | |
| 7 | M.Muller - Zudenigo (17) | 4 |
W | K |
= | 620 | 6 | 43 | |
| 8 | M.Muller - Zudenigo (17) | 4 |
S | 4 |
-1 | 50 | 3 | 46 | |
| 9 | M.Muller - Zudenigo (17) | 3 |
N | 3 |
-1 | 50 | 5 | 51 | |
| 13 | Atalski - Raczkiewicz (6) | 1 NT | E | 6 |
+2 | 150 | -2 | 49 | |
| 14 | Atalski - Raczkiewicz (6) | 4 x |
W | 10 |
-1 | 100 | -1 | 48 | |
| 15 | Atalski - Raczkiewicz (6) | 2 |
N | 8 |
+2 | 170 | 0 | 48 | |
| 19 | Rieger - Rohrbock (10) | 3 NT | N | J |
+4 | 520 | -1 | 47 | |
| 20 | Rieger - Rohrbock (10) | 4 |
W | J |
= | 620 | 7 | 54 | |
| 21 | Rieger - Rohrbock (10) | 1 |
N | K |
+1 | 90 | -1 | 53 | |
| 53 | |||||||||